Office Bearers

Category: CanRC

  • GS 2019 art 152

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 152 – Reopening Synod reopened in plenary session. The chairman had the meeting sing Hymn 64. He noted all synod members were present.

  • GS 2019 art 151

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 151 – Appointments This matter was dealt with by Synod in closed session. 1.   Material 1.1    Submissions from: Regional Synod West 2018 (8.1.2), Regional Synod East 2018 (8.1.4), the Board of Governors of CRTS (8.2.7.1, 8.2.7.2), the CWeb (8.2.10.2), the CBT (8.2.9), the CRCA (8.3.1), the CCCNA,(8.3.2), the SCBP (8.2.5.2)  2.   Board…

  • GS 2019 art 150

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 150 – Confidential Acts This matter was dealt with by Synod in closed session. Motion by the clerks of GS 2019: That the following decisions of GS 2019 be declared confidential Acts: Articles 94 (Viersen), 95 (Neerlandia), 98 (Bosma), 141 (Sloots). Ground: Each of these deals with matters involving sensitive personal information that has…

  • GS 2019 art 104

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 104 – GKv – Letter to the individual congregations and to synod The following text was adopted for a letter to be sent to all the Reformed Churches in The Netherlands (GKv) and brought in person to their synod 2021. The second clerk was instructed to ensure a Dutch translation is made…

  • GS 2019 art 149

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 149 – CRCA & CCCNA (Committee on Relations with Churches Abroad & Committee for Contact with Churches in North America) 1.   Material 1.1    Report of the Committee on Relations with Churches Abroad (CRCA) (8.2.2.1) 1.2    Report of the Committee for Contact with Churches in north America (CCCNA) (8.2.3.1) 1.3    Letters from the…

  • GS 2019 art 148

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 148 – FRCNA (Free Reformed Churches in North America) 1.   Material 1.1    Report of the Committee for Contact with Churches in North America (CCCNA) regarding the Free Reformed Churches in North America (FRCNA) (8.2.3.1). 1.2    Letters from the following churches: Lincoln -Vineyard (8.3.2.2), Attercliffe (8.3.2.6) 2.   Observations 2.1    GS 2016 (Art. 49) gave…

  • GS 2019 art 147

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 147 – GGRI-T (Reformed Churches in Indonesia – Timor) 1.   Material 1.1    Report of the Committee on Relations with Churches Abroad (CRCA) regarding the Reformed Churches in Indonesia-Timor (GGRI-T) (8.2.2.1) 1.2    Letter from the following church: Smithville (8.3.1.2) 2.   Observations 2.1    The Committee on Relations with Churches Abroad (CRCA) included in its…

  • GS 2019 art 146

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 146 – CWeb (Committee for the Official Website) 1.   Material 1.1    Report of the Committee for the Official Website (CWeb) (8.2.10.1) 1.2    Letters from the following churches: Burlington-Ebenezer (8.3.8.1), Barrhead (8.3.8.2), Toronto-Bethel (8.3.8.3), Grassie-Covenant (8.3.8.4), Burlington Waterdown-Rehoboth (8.3.8.5), Taber (8.3.8.6), London-Pilgrim (8.3.8.7), Orangeville (8.3.8.8) 2.   Observations 2.1    GS 2016 (Art. 49) gave the…

  • GS 2019 art 145

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 145 – SCBP (Standing Committee for the Book of Praise) 1.   Material 1.1    Report of the Standing Committee for the Publication of the Book of Praise (SCBP) (8.2.5.1) 1.2    Letters from the following churches: Willoughby Heights (8.3.7.1), Smithville (8.3.7.2), Lincoln-Vineyard (8.3.7.3), Carman-West (8.3.7.4), Ancaster (8.3.7.5), Fergus-Maranatha (8.3.7.6), Aldergrove (8.3.7.7) and Winnipeg-Grace…

  • GS 2019 art 144

    —

    by

    Roy Janssen
    in ,

    GS 2019 Article 144 – Appeal of Tintern Spring Creek re: GS 2016 Art. 103 (Confidentiality) 1. Material 1.1    Appeal to GS 2019 from church of Tintern Spring Creek re: the confidentiality of GS 2016 Art. 103 (8.6.12.1) 2. Admissibility 2.1    Since the matter concerns an appeal of a decision of GS 2016 it is admissible. 3. Observations 3.1   …